Auxerre closes gap on Bordeaux

Soccer Betting Lines

03/10/2010 - Bordeaux, France (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Two second-half goals from Ireneusz Jelen gave Auxerre a 2-1 comeback win at Bordeaux on Wednesday, allowing the visitors to move to within one point of Bordeaux at the top of the Ligue 1 table.

Bordeaux remains in first place on goal difference ahead of Montpellier with one game in hand, but they have allowed Auxerre to join the title chase with their fourth successive win.

The hosts were fortunate to go in front after seven minutes when a deflected cross from Benoit Tremoulinas found its way into the back of the net. However, Jelen leveled the contest in the 64th minute and scored the winning goal seven minutes from time.

Tremoulinas was looking to serve a ball into the box from the left wing when his cross struck the head of Auxerre's Benoit Pedretti, sending the ball looping over the head of goalkeeper Olivier Sorin.

Gregory Sertic almost made it 2-0 to Bordeaux before halftime when his shot was tipped onto the crossbar by Sorin, but the visitors came out strong in the second half and were the better side.

Daniel Niculae went close with a shot from 12 yards before he crossed the ball to the front of goal for Jelen to volley home.

Bordeaux appealed for offsides on the play, and they yelled even louder in the 83rd minute when a through ball from Cedric Hengbart put Jelen in behind the defense, and although his initial effort struck the crossbar, he was able to nod home the rebound with goalkeeper Cedric Carrasso beaten.

Allltheweb Soccer Betting News

<< Southland Conference Tournament Recaps
Katy, TX (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Eddie Williams scored 22 points and grabbed eight rebounds, and the second-seeded Stephen F. Austin Lumberjacks crushed the seventh-seeded Texas-Arlington Mavericks, 77-54, in quarterfinal action of the Southla

<< Conference USA Tournament Recaps
Tulsa, OK (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Aubrey Coleman had 29 points and five assists as Houston downed East Carolina, 93-80, in the first round of the Conference-USA Tournament. Kelvin Lewis had 15 points and Desmond Wade added 13 points and seven

<< Chelios joining Thrashers for 26th NHL season
Atlanta, GA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - The Atlanta Thrashers recalled veteran defenseman Chris Chelios on Wednesday, marking the 26th consecutive NHL season in which the 48-year-old will participate. Chelios has spent the entire season wit

<< Big 12 Conference Tournament Recaps
Kansas City, MO (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - John Roberson had 19 points, nine assists and five rebounds, as Texas Tech downed Colorado, 82-67, in the first round of the Big 12 Tournament. Nick Okorie had 18 points, Brad Reese added 16 points and se

<< Seven set for Tampa Bay Derby
Oldsmar, FL (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Schoolyard Dreams, second in the Sam F. Davis Stakes, heads a field of seven three-year-olds for Saturday's $300,000 Tampa Bay Derby at Tampa Bay Downs. In recent years the event has become an important

Zenyatta to face eight in Santa Margarita >>
Arcadia, CA (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Two-time champion mare Zenyatta makes her 2010 debut Saturday in the $250,000 Santa Margarita Invitational at Santa Anita Park. The six-year-old will take on eight other older females in the 1 1/8- mile ra

Savannah State joins MEAC >>
Winston-Salem, NC (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Savannah State University has been granted a provisional membership into the Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference, beginning July 1, 2010. The announcement was made Wednesday by the conference. "

Real Madrid crashes out of Champions League >>
Madrid, Spain (Sportsbook Betting Lines) - Real Madrid failed to advance to the quarterfinals of the Champions League for the sixth successive season as they were held to a 1-1 draw by Lyon at the Santiago Bernabeu on Wednesday, leaving them on

Tulsa Shock (WNBA) >>
Signed Marion Jones.

A's center fielder Crisp has hamstring injury >>
PHOENIX (AP) -New Oakland Athletics center fielder Coco Crisp has a strained left hamstring and it isn't clear how long he might be sidelined.Crisp, who is being listed as day-to-day, was underwent treatment Wednesday morning on the leg, which he ha

How did changes to college football betting rules affect bettors?

The 2007 college football rules changes that were implemented to shorten games are now history. The NCAA rules committee did what they set out to do; games were cut by an average of 14 minutes per game last season. There were also, on average, 14 fewer plays per game. We’ll get into how that did (or didn’t) affect games in regards to the pointspread a bit later.

While the NCAA rules committee may have had the betterment of the game in mind, they'll now “turn back the clock” for next season. Two key rules have now been overturned by the NCAA committee for the 2007 season, something definitely for the better.

For those of you who may not remember what those rules actually were, let us refresh your memory.

1) The first one was actually starting the clock on a kickoff as soon as the kicker touched the ball rather than waiting until the returner touched it. The problem here was near the end of the half (or game), if the team leading was kicking off, they could milk the clock by intentionally running offsides and then re-kicking. They could run 10-15 seconds off the clock each play while taking just five-yard penalties each time. They could run the clock down and simply cause the half (or game) to end on a kickoff, keeping the opposing offense off the field. In 2007, the clock will now start when the returner touches the ball as it had before last season.

2) The second rule dealt with starting the clock after a change of online football betting possession rather than waiting until the ball was snapped. This took a lot of time off the clock throughout the game as teams changed possession, however it caused the most problems late in games (or halves). Rather than huddling up and calling a play, the offensive team would have to rush onto the field as the clock started. This was a definite disadvantage to a team that was trying to come from behind late in the game. This year the clock will start on a change of possession, after the ball is snapped.

How did those rules affect the college game last year and will it make a difference this year when it comes to the pointspread? We commonly heard two theories when it came to these changes. First, it would affect scoring negatively. Second, it would hurt favorites as they would have less time and fewer plays to cover the number.

Did the rules hurt scoring? Yes. It seemed obvious that shortening the game by what amounted to 14 plays would push scoring downward. That was the case last year. Of the 119 Division 1A teams, 69 squads scored fewer points in 2007 than they did in 2005. Just 48 teams had a higher PPG scoring average and two stayed the same. Almost 59 percent of the teams in college football last year had a lower PPG average than they did in 2005. Expect more scoring in 2007 as we revert back to the old rules.

Did the rules hinder favorites from covering the number in 2007? Not really. Last year the favorites posted an overall spread record of 336-350-16 (48.9 percent). The year before, favorites were 316-326-13 (49.2 percent). In 2004, the favorites were 316-339-2 (48.2 percent). In fact, college football favorites have been above 50 percent for the season just once in the last seven years (in 2003). Last year’s numbers fell right in line with where they have been historically.

How about big favorites? The rules must have hurt them? Maybe a little bit. Double-digit favorites last year came in at a 47.8 percent clip compare with an average of just over 50 percent over the last seven years. Since 1980, favorites of -10 or more have covered at exactly a 50 percent clip (measured over 6,716 games).

Even bigger favorites must have struggled? Not really. In fact, it was just the opposite. Favorites of three TD’s or more were 59-54-2 last year (52.2 percent). Since 2000, those same favorites (-21 or higher) hit at 51.3 percent and since 1990 came in a clip of 50.3 percent. Stepping it up a notch to four TD favorites or higher, we actually see they've covered at a much better rate last season than before. Last year, favorites of -28 or more were 31-21-1, or almost 60 percent. Historically, four-TD-or-higher favorites have come in at a 50.7 percent spot since 2000 and only 48.9 percent since 1990. The “perceived” problem with the favorites covering at a reduced rate really never came to fruition.

Bottom line is, there might be some more scoring in 2007, but no real revelations when it comes to finding any pointspread golden nuggets.

To visit this online sportsbook got to MySportsbook.com for all your bet on college football needs. Mysportsbook.com online sportsbook accepts Visa and Mastercard credit cards.

How did changes to college football betting rules affect bettors?

The 2007 college football rules changes that were implemented to shorten games are now history. The NCAA rules committee did what they set out to do; games were cut by an average of 14 minutes per game last season. There were also, on average, 14 fewer plays per game. We’ll get into how that did (or didn’t) affect games in regards to the pointspread a bit later.

While the NCAA rules committee may have had the betterment of the game in mind, they'll now “turn back the clock” for next season. Two key rules have now been overturned by the NCAA committee for the 2007 season, something definitely for the better.

For those of you who may not remember what those rules actually were, let us refresh your memory.

1) The first one was actually starting the clock on a kickoff as soon as the kicker touched the ball rather than waiting until the returner touched it. The problem here was near the end of the half (or game), if the team leading was kicking off, they could milk the clock by intentionally running offsides and then re-kicking. They could run 10-15 seconds off the clock each play while taking just five-yard penalties each time. They could run the clock down and simply cause the half (or game) to end on a kickoff, keeping the opposing offense off the field. In 2007, the clock will now start when the returner touches the ball as it had before last season.

2) The second rule dealt with starting the clock after a change of online football betting possession rather than waiting until the ball was snapped. This took a lot of time off the clock throughout the game as teams changed possession, however it caused the most problems late in games (or halves). Rather than huddling up and calling a play, the offensive team would have to rush onto the field as the clock started. This was a definite disadvantage to a team that was trying to come from behind late in the game. This year the clock will start on a change of possession, after the ball is snapped.

How did those rules affect the college game last year and will it make a difference this year when it comes to the pointspread? We commonly heard two theories when it came to these changes. First, it would affect scoring negatively. Second, it would hurt favorites as they would have less time and fewer plays to cover the number.

Did the rules hurt scoring? Yes. It seemed obvious that shortening the game by what amounted to 14 plays would push scoring downward. That was the case last year. Of the 119 Division 1A teams, 69 squads scored fewer points in 2007 than they did in 2005. Just 48 teams had a higher PPG scoring average and two stayed the same. Almost 59 percent of the teams in college football last year had a lower PPG average than they did in 2005. Expect more scoring in 2007 as we revert back to the old rules.

Did the rules hinder favorites from covering the number in 2007? Not really. Last year the favorites posted an overall spread record of 336-350-16 (48.9 percent). The year before, favorites were 316-326-13 (49.2 percent). In 2004, the favorites were 316-339-2 (48.2 percent). In fact, college football favorites have been above 50 percent for the season just once in the last seven years (in 2003). Last year’s numbers fell right in line with where they have been historically.

How about big favorites? The rules must have hurt them? Maybe a little bit. Double-digit favorites last year came in at a 47.8 percent clip compare with an average of just over 50 percent over the last seven years. Since 1980, favorites of -10 or more have covered at exactly a 50 percent clip (measured over 6,716 games).

Even bigger favorites must have struggled? Not really. In fact, it was just the opposite. Favorites of three TD’s or more were 59-54-2 last year (52.2 percent). Since 2000, those same favorites (-21 or higher) hit at 51.3 percent and since 1990 came in a clip of 50.3 percent. Stepping it up a notch to four TD favorites or higher, we actually see they've covered at a much better rate last season than before. Last year, favorites of -28 or more were 31-21-1, or almost 60 percent. Historically, four-TD-or-higher favorites have come in at a 50.7 percent spot since 2000 and only 48.9 percent since 1990. The “perceived” problem with the favorites covering at a reduced rate really never came to fruition.

Bottom line is, there might be some more scoring in 2007, but no real revelations when it comes to finding any pointspread golden nuggets.

To visit this online sportsbook got to MySportsbook.com for all your bet on college football needs. Mysportsbook.com online sportsbook accepts Visa and Mastercard credit cards.